From f18819a92bcc92cc7c1311339c0146ec02172ba0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
Date: Jun 23 2016 01:16:54 +0000
Subject: Delete a few stray patches


---

diff --git a/efi-Make-EFI_SECURE_BOOT_SIG_ENFORCE-depend-on-EFI.patch b/efi-Make-EFI_SECURE_BOOT_SIG_ENFORCE-depend-on-EFI.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 095bea7..0000000
--- a/efi-Make-EFI_SECURE_BOOT_SIG_ENFORCE-depend-on-EFI.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-From 0081083434db41c15b72eced975da0bd9b80566b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:28:43 -0400
-Subject: [PATCH 12/20] efi: Make EFI_SECURE_BOOT_SIG_ENFORCE depend on EFI
-
-The functionality of the config option is dependent upon the platform being
-UEFI based.  Reflect this in the config deps.
-
-Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
----
- arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 ++-
- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
-index 14db458f4774..f6ff0a86d841 100644
---- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
-+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
-@@ -1735,7 +1735,8 @@ config EFI_MIXED
- 	   If unsure, say N.
- 
- config EFI_SECURE_BOOT_SIG_ENFORCE
--        def_bool n
-+	def_bool n
-+	depends on EFI
- 	prompt "Force module signing when UEFI Secure Boot is enabled"
- 	---help---
- 	  UEFI Secure Boot provides a mechanism for ensuring that the
--- 
-2.4.3
-
diff --git a/ipv4-fib-don-t-warn-when-primary-address-is-missing-.patch b/ipv4-fib-don-t-warn-when-primary-address-is-missing-.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 9e4cf4e..0000000
--- a/ipv4-fib-don-t-warn-when-primary-address-is-missing-.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
-From 9f79323a0aebccb9915ab8f4b7dcf531578b9cf9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:23:31 -0400
-Subject: [PATCH] ipv4/fib: don't warn when primary address is missing if
- in_dev is dead
-
-After commit fbd40ea0180a ("ipv4: Don't do expensive useless work
-during inetdev destroy.") when deleting an interface,
-fib_del_ifaddr() can be executed without any primary address
-present on the dead interface.
-
-The above is safe, but triggers some "bug: prim == NULL" warnings.
-
-This commit avoids warning if the in_dev is dead
-
-Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
----
- net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c | 6 +++++-
- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
-index 8a9246deccfe..63566ec54794 100644
---- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
-+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
-@@ -904,7 +904,11 @@ void fib_del_ifaddr(struct in_ifaddr *ifa, struct in_ifaddr *iprim)
- 	if (ifa->ifa_flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY) {
- 		prim = inet_ifa_byprefix(in_dev, any, ifa->ifa_mask);
- 		if (!prim) {
--			pr_warn("%s: bug: prim == NULL\n", __func__);
-+			/* if the device has been deleted, we don't perform
-+			 * address promotion
-+			 */
-+			if (!in_dev->dead)
-+				pr_warn("%s: bug: prim == NULL\n", __func__);
- 			return;
- 		}
- 		if (iprim && iprim != prim) {
--- 
-2.5.5
-