#2 Update to acts_as_list 1.0.1.
Merged 3 years ago by pvalena. Opened 3 years ago by pvalena.
rpms/ pvalena/rubygem-acts_as_list rebase  into  master

file modified
+7 -3
@@ -2,11 +2,11 @@ 

  %global gem_name acts_as_list

  

  Name: rubygem-%{gem_name}

- Version: 0.9.16

- Release: 5%{?dist}

+ Version: 1.0.1

+ Release: 1%{?dist}

  Summary: A gem allowing a active_record model to act_as_list

  License: MIT

- URL: http://github.com/swanandp/acts_as_list

+ URL: http://github.com/brendon/acts_as_list

  Source0: https://rubygems.org/gems/%{gem_name}-%{version}.gem

  BuildRequires: ruby(release)

  BuildRequires: rubygems-devel
@@ -74,6 +74,10 @@ 

  %{gem_instdir}/%{gem_name}.gemspec

  

  %changelog

+ * Sat Aug 22 01:21:40 GMT 2020 Pavel Valena <pvalena@redhat.com> - 1.0.1-1

+ - Update to acts_as_list 1.0.1.

+   Resolves: rhbz#1686627

+ 

  * Wed Jul 29 2020 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@fedoraproject.org> - 0.9.16-5

  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild

  

file modified
+1 -1
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 

- SHA512 (acts_as_list-0.9.16.gem) = e01c7814669bfd408a27b37ff88c42adfd52b4001f0e835f134dbb5de8d041d27dc95b3549271ffe81b3b5991e149ff0958f8c14bb59425f29dd1493db474f22

+ SHA512 (acts_as_list-1.0.1.gem) = 15a0cd7e6c89ba6ed218c5e866b15c33ae64f5ed1587de67ec6ea20480fa622ec32f3131e714ff0d5196189a46d5d745ff5de026c451a485ebb735df73ef9ce5

Resolves: rhbz#1686627


Up-to-date Koji scratch-build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=54353948

Up-to-date Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/1723705

Checks:

  • Tests: ok
  • Syntax check: ok
  • Dependent packages: ok
  • Smoke test: N/A
  • rpmlint: ok

Update log: https://git.io/JUefr
Test log: https://git.io/JTP70
gem2rpm diff: https://git.io/JTP7E

Does your automated check include the rpmlint and dependency check? Updating from version 0.X to 1.X is a major version up.

Your automated program looks nice.
I want to see it will be improved not to ask this kind of question showing the results of the rpmlint, dependency check and installation in the message on the PR.

Your automated program looks nice.
I want to see it will be improved not to ask this kind of question showing the results of the rpmlint, dependency check and installation in the message on the PR.

Thanks! It's there in the test log.

Does your automated check include the rpmlint and dependency check? Updating from version 0.X to 1.X is a major version up.

Yes, sorry, the checks are there, but the update summary is missing.

Thanks! It's there in the test log.

OK. nice!

rebased onto f779393

3 years ago

Updated, retested, LGTM.

Pull-Request has been merged by pvalena

3 years ago