From f6e8de78c74b837878a07c0d9f14d69a80df83ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:20:49 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Build with -Werror-implicit-int where supported

(cherry picked from commit 873d864230c9c64c65ff12a24199bac3adf3bc2f)
---
 src/aclocal.m4 | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/aclocal.m4 b/src/aclocal.m4
index 2bfb994..da1d6d8 100644
--- a/src/aclocal.m4
+++ b/src/aclocal.m4
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ if test "$GCC" = yes ; then
     TRY_WARN_CC_FLAG(-Wno-format-zero-length)
     # Other flags here may not be supported on some versions of
     # gcc that people want to use.
-    for flag in overflow strict-overflow missing-format-attribute missing-prototypes return-type missing-braces parentheses switch unused-function unused-label unused-variable unused-value unknown-pragmas sign-compare newline-eof error=uninitialized error=pointer-arith error=int-conversion error=incompatible-pointer-types error=discarded-qualifiers ; do
+    for flag in overflow strict-overflow missing-format-attribute missing-prototypes return-type missing-braces parentheses switch unused-function unused-label unused-variable unused-value unknown-pragmas sign-compare newline-eof error=uninitialized error=pointer-arith error=int-conversion error=incompatible-pointer-types error=discarded-qualifiers error=implicit-int ; do
       TRY_WARN_CC_FLAG(-W$flag)
     done
     #  old-style-definition? generates many, many warnings